One of the most remarkable settings for Negro league baseball was the Catholic Protectory Oval in the Bronx, home of the New York Lincoln Giants in the 1920s. The Lincolns’ original home, Olympic Field in Harlem, had been built by the club’s founders, Roderick James “Jess” McMahon and his brother Edward*, for their white semipro club, the Olympic A.C., back in 1905. The McMahons lost control of both Olympic Field and the Lincoln Giants in 1915, founding a new black club, the Lincoln Stars, which played at Lenox Oval for a couple of seasons. The Lincoln Giants, under the ownership of James J. Keenan and Charles Harvey, continued at Olympic until 1920.
(*-Jess McMahon was eventually best known as a boxing and wrestling promoter, an associate of Tex Rickard and Carlos Henriquez. You’ve heard of his grandson.)
At the start of the 1920 season Olympic Field was torn down, and its bleachers were transferred to the ball field at the Catholic Protectory, a famous orphanage in the Bronx. Sunday semipro and amateur games had been played there for a couple of decades, but the coming of the famous African-American team would bring much larger crowds.
Here’s an illustration of the Catholic Protectory from sometime before 1920, with the Oval situated in the center left. The outfield bleachers had not been installed yet. (From Lawrence Ritter’s East Side, West Side: Tales of New York Sporting Life, 1910-1960.)
Here’s a diagram from a Sanborn fire insurance map, showing the Oval in 1929, the year the Lincolns joined the American Negro League, the short-lived successor to the Eastern Colored League:
And here, courtesy of Kevin Johnson (who has written a couple of posts on the 1928 Negro leagues), is a fantastic aerial photo of the Catholic Protectory Oval in 1924, the Lincolns’ second season in the ECL:
The scorekeeper’s table was placed under the trees visible here along the right field line.
Aside from the neo-Gothic architecture surrounding it, the other unusual feature of the Oval was its cramped shape. Kevin asked the ballpark expert Ron Selter, author of Ballparks of the Deadball Era, to estimate the dimensions. This is what he came up with:
LF 180
SLF 238
LC 358 (deepest point in park)
CF 292 (the HP-CF axis hit the CF end of the RF-CF bleachers)
RC 286
SRF 256
RF 180
Ron remarked (to Kevin) that it reminded him of “a miniature version of the playing field at the Polo Grounds.”
The data I’ve gathered definitely suggests that the Catholic Protectory Oval increased offense by huge amounts. Any hitter with the Lincoln Giants in the 1920s—I’m looking at you, Chino Smith—probably saw his stats greatly inflated by the park, in the midst of what was already a very high-scoring era.
The Lincoln Giants’ successors in the 1930s, most notably the New York Black Yankees, moved to other venues; and in 1938 the Catholic Protectory was razed to make way for the Parkchester Apartments.
UPDATE 3/1/2011 Corrected dates on the map & aerial photo.
I agree. Maybe any balls hit into the trees or bleachers were doubles automatically.
Posted by: Kevin | March 2, 2011 at 04:04 PM
Kevin, I'd think there would almost *have* to be ground rules with these dimensions...
BA: I don't know about the early history of the Oval, but it could well have been orginally intended for cricket (or other sports).
Posted by: Gary Ashwill | March 2, 2011 at 11:15 AM
Looking at what may be the newest 1928 data:
Home Games - 29
Doubles - 118
HR - 47
Away Games - 14
Doubles - 39
HR - 7
Posted by: Kevin | March 2, 2011 at 02:34 AM
Gary - I'm suspecting there may have been a ground rule that called some over the fence balls down the lines as doubles. For all 40 Lincoln games in 1928 that you have data for, Lincoln and their opponents had around 150 doubles. Given the configuration of the park, I would think doubles would be hard to come by unless some out of play fly balls were ground rule doubles.
Posted by: Kevin | March 2, 2011 at 02:27 AM
I like the fact that the name "oval" seems to imply that it was built for cricket. Given what happened to that sport in the US in the 20th century, I find it fun to see these brief and tangential references in early 20th century baseball topics
Posted by: BA | March 1, 2011 at 08:03 PM