« sanborn typography | Main | the murder of walter dickey »

February 28, 2011



I agree. Maybe any balls hit into the trees or bleachers were doubles automatically.

Gary Ashwill

Kevin, I'd think there would almost *have* to be ground rules with these dimensions...

BA: I don't know about the early history of the Oval, but it could well have been orginally intended for cricket (or other sports).


Looking at what may be the newest 1928 data:

Home Games - 29
Doubles - 118
HR - 47

Away Games - 14
Doubles - 39
HR - 7


Gary - I'm suspecting there may have been a ground rule that called some over the fence balls down the lines as doubles. For all 40 Lincoln games in 1928 that you have data for, Lincoln and their opponents had around 150 doubles. Given the configuration of the park, I would think doubles would be hard to come by unless some out of play fly balls were ground rule doubles.


I like the fact that the name "oval" seems to imply that it was built for cricket. Given what happened to that sport in the US in the 20th century, I find it fun to see these brief and tangential references in early 20th century baseball topics

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Tip Jar


Tip Jar

Other Projects

Important Posts

Sports History & Research


Blog powered by Typepad